Writing for both State and StateT

Jon Cast jcast@ou.edu
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:38:31 -0500

Derek Elkins <ddarius@hotpop.com> wrote :


> Yes, I've tried it. I didn't mean GHCi doesn't EVER validate the
> constraints on input, just that it doesn't when you use :t.

So do you mean to use :t & cut & paste the definition?  Interesting.  A
fair bit of work (more than just adding a parameter () to the
definition), but I guess it'd work.


Jon Cast