Rational sequence

[Frank Atanassow]

Frank Atanassow wrote (on 22-10-02 15:08 +0200):
> Jerzy Karczmarczuk wrote (on 22-10-02 13:05 +0200):
> > What do you think, what
> > is the Rational form of 2.3 ? (GHCi says 23/10).
> > 
> > The answer is:
> > 
> > 2589569785738035 % 1125899906842624
> 
> Er, why?
> 
> Because 2.3 is not representable using a double precision float or something?

Oh, sorry. I understand Jerzy to be saying that that big long fraction was the
result that he _wanted_, but instead the opposite seems to be true.

That explains things. :)

-- 
Frank