IO and syntax
Ashley Yakeley
ashley@semantic.org
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 21:55:43 -0800
At 2002-03-12 20:18, Jyrinx wrote:
>Of course, this "probable cause" is ridiculous at face value ... anyway,
>my code makes as much sense to me as it can at the moment ... how should
>I get it to make sense to GHC? (I couldn't find any examples on
I can see the bug. It's a very common one when using monads and the 'do'
notation -- confusing 'a' with 'IO a'.
When in doubt, add type signatures to everything. You'll soon narrow it
down.
--
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA