character syntax

[Jon Fairbairn]

> All this taken together, I mean, _really_, is the lexical structure of
> Haskell a botch, or what?

No. Innovative. All the problems described in this thread
reflect unwarranted assumptions inherited in emacs. It's
plainly possible to parse Haskell, and not hard either. =


  J=F3n


-- =

J=F3n Fairbairn                                 Jon.Fairbairn@cl.cam.ac.u=
k
31 Chalmers Road                                         jf@cl.cam.ac.uk
Cambridge CB1 3SZ            +44 1223 570179 (after 14:00 only, please!)