Question aboutthe use of an inner forall
Sun, 18 Aug 2002 19:26:39 -0700
At 2002-08-18 18:19, Scott J. wrote:
>A question: s is not a type variable as a isn't it?
Both are quantified type variables. But only one of those quantifiers can
be placed at the top level of the expression.
runST :: forall a. ((forall s. ST s a) -> a)
> I mean a can be of type Integer while s cannot.
Well yes, you can specialise "forall a" to Integer. So runST can be
specialised to this type:
runST ::[special] (forall s. ST s Integer) -> Integer
...whereas you cannot specialise "s" in the same way. Think of it in
terms of logic, if for all a: f(a), then by simple specialisation
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA