newbie conceptual question [from haskell list]
Fri, 27 Jul 2001 14:12:17 +0100 (BST)
To correct the incoimprehensible sentence...
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, D. Tweed wrote:
> actually happens to be implementation defined. But I don't consider that
> when I screw up by allocating memory outside array bounds to be a bug due
> to implementation-definedness, it's a bug because I didn't spot some
> interaction that caused the variable that ^ I was accessing the array at to
held the index
> become a value that was to big.
www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~tweed/pi.htm |tweed's law: however many computers
email: email@example.com | you have, half your time is spent
work tel: (0117) 954-5250 | waiting for compilations to finish.