A sample revised prelude for numeric classes
Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:58:10 +0000 (GMT)
On 12 Feb 2001, Ketil Malde wrote:
> email@example.com (Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk) writes:
> >> Why do you stop at allowing addition on Dollars and not include
> >> multiplication by a scalar?
> > Perhaps because there is no good universal type for (*).
> > Sorry, it would have to have a different symbol.
> Is this ubiquitous enough that we should have a *standardized*
> different symbol? =20
I'd think so.
> Any candidates?
=2E* *. [and .*.] ?
where the "." is on the side of the scalar
J=F3n Fairbairn Jon.Fairbairn@cl.cam.ac.uk
31 Chalmers Road firstname.lastname@example.org
Cambridge CB1 3SZ +44 1223 570179 (pm only, please)