What do you think about Mercury?
Fergus Henderson
fjh@cs.mu.oz.au
Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:49:20 +1000
On 08-Apr-2001, Terrence Brannon <princepawn@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> I have decided to escape the world of Perl into something more
> definitional. I gave up on CAML and Erlang because they contain
> imperative elements and I am tired of that form of coding. So, I have
> narrowed it down to Haskell and Mercury.
...
> http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/research/mercury/information/comparison_with_haskell.html
That page really only describes the differences in the type systems.
A very important distinction between Mercury and Haskell which that page
just skims over is that Haskell is lazy by default, and Mercury is not.
--
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au> | "I have always known that the pursuit
| of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.