GHC 8.4.1-rc1 is slower on a ray-tracer project
ben at well-typed.com
Wed Feb 28 19:22:06 UTC 2018
David Feuer <david.feuer at gmail.com> writes:
> I don't see how 62 seconds rather than 60 is anything close to going off
> the rails. Did I read something wrong? This sounds more like a minor wibble.
"Off the rails" was a rhetorical flourish; indeed a single program
regressing by 3% isn't a catastrophe.
That being said, runtime performance improvements are hard-won prizes.
Consider that the largest allocations improvement arising from the
"Compiling without Continuations" paper was ~8%. Consequently, if
someone comes along with a 3% regression we would remiss not to
take it seriously.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 487 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users