GHC 8.0.1 status

Christiaan Baaij christiaan.baaij at
Sat Feb 27 22:04:40 UTC 2016

Given that I was working on at least once package ( which gave panics on
GHC8-rc2, couldn't we get at least an GHC8-rc3 before doing an 8.0.1
release in 3 weeks?

On 27 February 2016 at 14:57, Ben Gamari <ben at> wrote:

> tl;dr. Stabilizing the ghc-8.0 is taking a bit longer than was anticipated.
>        The release schedule is being pushed back a bit.
> Hello everyone,
> As you likely know we are currently in the depths of the 8.0 release. In
> fact, under more ideal circumstances I would probably be cutting another
> release candidate right now instead of writing this email, in
> preparation for a final release next week or so.
> However, our world is far from ideal as evidenced by the number
> [1] of significant bugs present on the 8.0 branch. This isn't altogether
> unexpected; we knew we were taking a bit of a risk in merging so many
> high-impact patches in one release. However, we thought that given a
> longer-than-usual period between first-candidate and the final release,
> we'd have enough time to smooth out the wrinkles. Sadly, this has taken
> a bit longer than we anticipated.
> Of course, the last thing we want is to push a known buggy release out
> the door. Consequently, we won't be delivering the 8.0.1 release next
> week as originally planned. Instead, we'll be pushing the release back
> by about three weeks. This will give developers a bit more breathing
> room in which to work out the remaining issues. Hopefully in a few weeks
> the tree will be in such a state that we can push out yet another
> candidate which, with luck, will be the last before the release.
> If you'd like to expedite the process (and have fun in the process), you
> could do worse than to having a look at Trac [1], choosing a bug of your
> liking, and trying your hand at solving it.
> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this effort thusfar.
> If you have any questions about the release process or how you can help,
> don't hesistate to ask.
> Cheers,
> - Ben
> [1]
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-devs mailing list
> ghc-devs at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list