record field names vs. -fwarn-unused-binds
qdunkan at gmail.com
Wed Nov 4 17:20:17 UTC 2015
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Thomas Miedema <thomasmiedema at gmail.com> wrote:
> Through a patch by Oleg Grenrus (phadej), GHC 8 will have the following new
> So you'll be able to pick and choose.
I suppose a record accessor would be considered a top bind? I still
kind of like getting warnings about those, just not the ones from
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Henning Thielemann
<lemming at henning-thielemann.de> wrote:
> I do it this way and I do not consider it a work-around. The underscore is
> just the shortest way to say that a record field name is not used. It's
> shorter than any pragma could be.
I agree, that's what I meant by "not much better than changing the name".
I guess it would have to be yet another flag like
-fwarn-unused-record-accessors... not sure if it would be worth it
though, considering it's a relatively minor issue.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users