Permitting trailing commas for record syntax ADT declarations

Richard Eisenberg eir at cis.upenn.edu
Mon Sep 29 13:27:02 UTC 2014


To be fair, I'm not sure I like the make-commas-optional approach either. But, the solution occurred to me as possible, so I thought it was worth considering as we're exploring the design space.

And, yes, I was suggesting only to make them optional, not to require everyone remove them.

Richard

On Sep 26, 2014, at 5:34 PM, Brandon Allbery <allbery.b at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think that's necessarily is good style. I don't think we want two different ways of doing import lists.
> 
> Yes; I kinda hate the idea myself, it encourages an unreadable programming style. But it's not the wholesale breaking change you were suggesting, either.
> 
> -- 
> brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
> allbery.b at gmail.com                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net
> unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20140929/59df8875/attachment.html>


More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list