Hiding module *exports*

[Daniel Trstenjak]

Hi Tom,

+1

> There's a little bit of bikeshedding that needs to happen (e.g. is "hiding (Foo
> (..))" sufficient to hide the type Foo and not just its constructors), but are
> people +1 on this? I've frequently wanted this behavior.

I would be surprised if 'Foo(..)' would mean in this case something
different, so yes, the type Foo should be hidden too.


Greetings,
Daniel