Future of DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS?

[harry]

Simon Marlow-7 wrote
> Is it just shortage of space, or is there anything else that pushes you 
> towards DYNAMIC_GHC_PROGRAMS=NO?  Isn't disk space cheap?

Disc space is prohibitively expensive for zero-budget open source projects
deployed to the free tier of cloud computing providers.

We typically get 1Gb for everything, including GHC, third-party libraries,
our own code, and data. A full install of GHC is nearly 1Gb by itself.



--
View this message in context: http://haskell.1045720.n5.nabble.com/Future-of-DYNAMIC-GHC-PROGRAMS-tp5749793p5750165.html
Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.