RC2 build failure on Debian: armhf
fuuzetsu at fuuzetsu.co.uk
Sat Mar 15 10:24:05 UTC 2014
On 14/03/14 20:05, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> armhf still fails like in RC1:
> 0% ( 0 / 5) in 'WwLib'
> 0% ( 0 / 2) in 'DmdAnal'
> 0% ( 0 / 2) in 'WorkWrap'
> TcSplice.tcTopSpliceExpr is exported by the hs-boot file, but not exported by the module
> TcSplice.runMetaE is exported by the hs-boot file, but not exported by the module
> TcSplice.runMetaP is exported by the hs-boot file, but not exported by the module
> TcSplice.runMetaT is exported by the hs-boot file, but not exported by the module
> TcSplice.runMetaD is exported by the hs-boot file, but not exported by the module
> 67% ( 2 / 3) in 'CmmPipeline'
> 0% ( 0 / 3) in 'StgCmmHpc'
> 0% ( 0 / 13) in 'PrelInfo'
> 0% ( 0 / 4) in 'StgCmmCon'
> 0% ( 0 / 2) in 'StgCmmExpr'
> 0% ( 0 / 6) in 'StgCmmBind'
> 0% ( 0 / 2) in 'CmmParse'
> 0% ( 0 / 2) in 'StgCmm'
> 5% ( 9 /175) in 'TcRnMonad'
> make: *** [compiler/stage2/doc/html/ghc/ghc.haddock] Error 1
> Any ideas? Anyone feeling responsible?
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
Does building without docs work? Does building HEAD with docs work?
I don't have an ARM machine to try and while it looks like Haddock
messing up, I'm somewhat sceptical that's where the problem is.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users