RFC: include a cabal-install executable in future GHC releases
Herbert Valerio Riedel
hvr at gnu.org
Wed Jan 22 11:55:53 UTC 2014
On 2014-01-22 at 10:08:02 +0100, Henning Thielemann wrote:
> Am 22.01.2014 09:57, schrieb Herbert Valerio Riedel:
>> On 2014-01-21 at 20:22:48 +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
>>> I feel this blurs the roles of GHC and the Platform.
>> IMO, that's a weak argument, as the roles are already blurred:
>> GHC comes with `haddock`, `hp2ps`, and `hpc` executables which could be
>> provided by the HP instead.
> At least haddock is bound to the specific GHC version.
When I look at http://hackage.haskell.org/package/haddock, there are
multiple versions, 2.12.0 and the 4 versions of 2.13.*, which are all
declared to work with ghc == 7.6.*, that is, 5 haddock versions
compatible with 3 released versions of GHC 7.6. So while it may be bound
to a major version of the GHC API, haddock can obviously have more
releases than GHC has releases (otherwise it could just carry GHC's
version), and can therefore be updated.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users