Enabling TypeHoles by default

Edward Kmett ekmett at gmail.com
Mon Jan 13 18:54:25 UTC 2014


I have to admit, I rather like this suggestion.

-Edward


On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Krzysztof Gogolewski <
krz.gogolewski at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> As discussed on ghc-devs, I propose to enable -XTypeHoles in GHC by
> default. Rationale:
>
> (1) This way holes are far easier to use; just entering "_" allows to
> check type of a subexpression, no need of adding "-XTypeHoles".
>
> (2) This affects error messages only; i.e. the set of programs that
> compile stays the same - Haskell 2010. The only exception is that if you
> use -fdefer-type-errors, then a program with a hole compiles, but this
> seems fine with philosophy of -fdefer-type-errors.
>
> If so: would you like it to be in 7.8 or wait a cycle? My preference is
> 7.8, two people (John and Richard) suggested 7.10.
>
> -KG
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20140113/62f2e3bf/attachment.html>


More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list