base package -- goals
Joachim Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de
Thu Mar 7 21:22:02 CET 2013
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 26.02.2013, 10:08 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton-Jones:
> I think it would be vv helpful to have all these goals articulated on
> the wiki page.
>
> http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/SplitBase
>
well, all the goals are there (or are they not sufficiently well
explained)?
I also tried to compare the two approaches – the re-exporting
API-specifying packages and the actual split of base – by listing their
advantages (I skipped the disadvantages, these would just be the
negation of the other advantages list...) at
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/SplitBase#Approaches
I don’t feel in the position to actually make a call here, or even to
cast a vote with confidence, but I’m happy to continue summarizing the
discussion until a consensus is found. If there is more discussion, that
is.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20130307/c89fa75d/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list