Overloaded record fields
simonpj at microsoft.com
Thu Jun 27 11:33:58 CEST 2013
| Exactly! (I did tell you so:
| billed as "optional syntactic sugar")
I confess that I had not fully taken in this suggestion; thank you for reminding me. The last round exceeded my input bandwidth, and in any case I often need to be told things more than once.
Anyway, glad to hear what others think about the idea.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users