Overloaded record fields

Simon Peyton-Jones simonpj at microsoft.com
Thu Jun 27 11:33:58 CEST 2013

|  Exactly! (I did tell you so:
| http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Records/DeclaredOverloadedRecordFields/DotPostfix
|  billed as "optional syntactic sugar")

I confess that I had not fully taken in this suggestion; thank you for reminding me.  The last round exceeded my input bandwidth, and in any case I often need to be told things more than once.

Anyway, glad to hear what others think about the idea.


More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list