roma at ro-che.info
Mon Jan 14 23:33:18 CET 2013
* Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> [2013-01-14 14:29:57-0800]
> Let me rephrase: how will Simon's proposed "data constructors are in
> scope" mechanism work? For example, will
> let xs :: Map = ...
> in map MyNewtype xs
> behave differently if the constructors of Map are in scope or not?
Coercion is never implicit. In Simon's original proposal, for example,
you need to define coercion functions using a special syntax.
So this code will always work in the same, traditional way.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users