base package (Was: GHC 7.8 release?)
Simon Peyton-Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Fri Feb 15 10:36:10 CET 2013
| > Doesn't the FFI pull in some part of the I/O layer, though? In
| > particular threaded programs are going to end up using forkOS?
|
| Another good reason to try to have a pure ground library.
Remember that we have UNSAFE ffi calls and SAFE ones.
The SAFE ones may block, cause GC etc. They involve a lot of jiggery pokery and I would not be surprised if that affected the I/O manager.
But UNSAFE ones are, by design, no more than "fat machine instructions" that are implemented by taking an out-of-line call. They should not block. They should not cause GC. Nothing. Think of 'sin' and 'cos' for example.
Fingerprinting is a classic example, I would have thought.
So my guess is that it should not be hard to allow UNSAFE ffi calls in the core (non-IO-ish) bits, leaving SAFE calls for higher up the stack.
Simon
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list