cascading type errors in ghc
malcolm.wallace at me.com
Fri Aug 9 10:48:30 CEST 2013
On 6 Aug 2013, at 20:03, Evan Laforge wrote:
> I don't know how others like to work, but I like when a compiler bails
> early, because I fix errors one at a time, and I search for the
> easiest looking ones before worrying about the complicated looking
With C compilers, it is often the case that only the first error is real, and the subsequent errors are consequences of not being able to recover from the first one.
However, one of the really nice things about GHC is that the list of type errors is complete and coherent. I often start at the bottom of the list and work my way up fixing them in a single pass (upwards, in order to give myself the best chance that the line numbers are still correct after I have fixed the later errors). There are not many compilers you can do that with, and I like it when I can.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users