Why is GHC so much worse than JHC when computing the Ackermann function?
the.dead.shall.rise at gmail.com
Sat Apr 20 12:24:33 CEST 2013
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Mikhail Glushenkov
<the.dead.shall.rise at gmail.com> wrote:
> Surely it must be possible to make
> the GHC version at least 2x as slow as Ocaml/GHC?
() ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
/\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users