Dynamic libraries by default and GHC 7.8

dag.odenhall at gmail.com dag.odenhall at gmail.com
Wed Nov 28 03:25:44 CET 2012


And on 32 bit Linux, which apparently is known to suffer from dynamic...
Though from 20ms to 100ms is more than 30% penalty.


On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:16 AM, dag.odenhall at gmail.com <
dag.odenhall at gmail.com> wrote:

> That was with GHC 7.4.1, I should add. I didn't measure overall
> performance difference, only the time to finish a command-line invocation.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:11 AM, dag.odenhall at gmail.com <
> dag.odenhall at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Ian Lynagh <ian at well-typed.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This has some advantages and some disadvantages, so we need to make a
>>> decision about what we want to do in GHC 7.8.
>>>
>>
>> When I built my CLI app with dynamic linking, the time to run and
>> complete a command went from 20ms to 100ms, which is particularly
>> noticeable when used via its bash completions which call the program to
>> provide completions.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20121128/a1ea0a19/attachment.htm>


More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list