thoughts on the record update problem

Gershom B gershomb at
Thu Mar 8 23:11:09 CET 2012

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Greg Weber <greg at> wrote:
> syntax we would like. Does that make sense? I take it that you agree
> that we should separate the discussion of semantics from
> implementation: this is a perfect example of why.

If we can describe semantics without concern for the possibility/needs
of implementation, then I've got some _great_ proposals I'd like to


More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list