karel.gardas at centrum.cz
Sun Feb 5 21:25:51 CET 2012
as far as I understand, via-C was removed for registerised builds, but
is still supported for unregisterised builds.
So if you prefer via-C way, just compile GHC unregistered on your platform.
On 02/ 5/12 07:48 PM, Serge D. Mechveliani wrote:
> Dear GHC team,
> I cannot understand why do you remove the C stage in GHC.
> To my mind: let the result be 3 times slower, but preserve the C code.
> Because it works everyhere, and there is no real need to rewrite
> the same program separately for all the existing processors
> (which number may become, for example, 11000).
> I am naive, and am not a specialist.
> But only an invariant program ever has sense.
> Has the modern GHC a sensible compilation result level to be observed
> (documented?) (graph rewriting code, or like this) ?
> mechvel at botik.ru
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users