via-C
Serge D. Mechveliani
mechvel at botik.ru
Sun Feb 5 19:48:41 CET 2012
Dear GHC team,
I cannot understand why do you remove the C stage in GHC.
To my mind: let the result be 3 times slower, but preserve the C code.
Because it works everyhere, and there is no real need to rewrite
the same program separately for all the existing processors
(which number may become, for example, 11000).
I am naive, and am not a specialist.
But only an invariant program ever has sense.
Has the modern GHC a sensible compilation result level to be observed
(documented?) (graph rewriting code, or like this) ?
Regards,
------
Sergei
mechvel at botik.ru
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list