Mailing list reorganisation

[Niklas Larsson]

Sounds good, even if one wants to receive everything it's much easier
to robustly filter the incoming mail when it comes from different
addresses.

Niklas

2012/12/11 Ian Lynagh <ian at well-typed.com>:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Following a recent discussion, we propose to reorganise the GHC-related
> mailing lists so that we end up with:
>
>     glasgow-haskell-users
>         For user discussions
>
>     ghc-devs
>         For developer discussions
>
>     ghc-commits
>         For automated commit messages from the git repositories
>
>     ghc-builds
>         For automated nightly build reports
>
>     ghc-tickets
>         For automated messages from trac
>
> We would remove
>     cvs-ghc cvs-libraries cvs-other glasgow-haskell-bugs
> but leave the archives in place, and for now forwarding messages to
> cvs-* to ghc-devs, and glasgow-haskell-bugs to ghc-tickets.
> (cvs-libraries and cvs-other are included in this list, because we think
> they are mainly used by libraries that GHC HQ maintains, or by GHC's
> lagging repos of libraries that other people maintain).
>
> The initial subscriber lists for ghc-devs, ghc-commits and ghc-builds
> would be the union of the subscribers of cvs-ghc, cvs-libraries and
> cvs-other. For ghc-tickets it would be the subscriber list for
> glasgow-haskell-bugs.
>
> Does that sound reasonable? Does anyone have any further questions or
> comments?
>
>
> Thanks
> Ian
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users