Hoopl vs LLVM?

Greg Fitzgerald garious at gmail.com
Tue Dec 11 23:07:57 CET 2012

Thank you all for your replies.

On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Simon Peyton-Jones
<simonpj at microsoft.com>wrote:

> And I think there is probably quite a lot that is in reach for C--, but
> out of reach for LLVM.  Why?  Because before we pass the code to LLVM we do
> CPS-conversion.

Is there a case for making a C/C++ compiler target C-- instead of LLVM?  Or
does its optimizations cater more to functional programming or lazy

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20121211/757ef43a/attachment.htm>

More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list