proposal: separate lists for ghc-cvs commits and ghc-dev chatter
Andrew Farmer
afarmer at ittc.ku.edu
Thu Dec 6 19:02:56 CET 2012
I'd also like to follow discussions, but unsubscribed from cvs-ghc due to
the volume.
Maybe the reply-to field on cvs-ghc emails could be set to
glasgow-haskell-bugs? (or whatever the agreed upon dev list is called)
Then if someone replies to a bot/commit message on cvs-ghc, it
automatically goes to the place where active discussion happens, and those
of us that don't want so many emails won't have to dig through cvs-ghc to
find the interesting bits.
Andrew
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Sean Leather <leather at cs.uu.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Ian Lynagh wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 06:25:49PM +0200, Roman Cheplyaka wrote:
>> >
>> > +1. I'd like to follow GHC development discussions, but getting all the
>> > commits is too much.
>>
>> I'm surprised by this, FWIW. I think skimming the commits is a good way
>> to get an idea of what's going on,
>
>
> Indeed, it can be. But I can't keep up with the huge number of commits
> everyday, and I'm not interested in the large majority of them.
>
> while discussions between developers
>> tend to be focussed on particular obscure points (e.g. discussing
>> correctness of a murky corner in the intersection between 2 new type
>> system extensions, or discussing the way PIC is handled on OSX/PowerPC)
>> which I wouldn't have thought were of much interest to any party not
>> involved in the discussion and familiar with the details.
>>
>
> I find these things (both examples, actually) more interesting. I'm more
> likely to follow such threads than I am to skim the commits.
>
> Anyway, I'm not really too fussed about what mailing lists we have. I'll
>> just subscribe to them all anyway :-)
>>
>
> I'm not too fussed about it, either, but I wouldn't mind a restructuring.
> I might even subscribe to them all as well, but then it will be easier to
> follow the commits at a different pace from the rest (without having to
> create a new filter, which I've been so far too lazy to do).
>
> Regards,
> Sean
>
> _______________________________________________
> Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
> Glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20121206/b199bae0/attachment.htm>
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list