[Haskell-cafe] lambda case

[Brandon Allbery]

On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <roma at ro-che.info> wrote:

> I find this discussion useful — there are some interesting points
> (splitting "case of" into two parts) that I don't remember reading in the
> original thread (but maybe it's just me).
>

Mentioned twice that I recall, as treating 'of' as a lambda and as '\of'.
 It got somewhat short shrift, likely because while it makes sense from an
existing language syntax viewpoint, it makes little to none from a
readability standpoint.

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20121201/9ab1d30c/attachment.htm>