GHC and Haskell 98
Bas van Dijk
v.dijk.bas at gmail.com
Sat Jun 18 17:46:35 CEST 2011
On 17 June 2011 16:47, Simon Peyton-Jones <simonpj at microsoft.com> wrote:
> So: Under Plan A, some Hackage packages will become un-compilable,
> and will require source code changes to fix them. I do not have
> any idea how many Hackage packages would fail in this way.
Of the 372 direct reverse dependencies of haskell98:
there are 344 which also depend on base (See http://hpaste.org/47933
for calculating the intersection).
Am I correct that a package which depends on both base and haskell98
will always fail to build when the Prelude is also exported from
haskell98? (Unless of course the package uses the PackageImports
I don't know how many of these 344 packages use PackageImports or have
upper bounds on their haskell98 dependency (I guess not many). So I
guess many of these 344 will break.
Still I'm in favour of plan A since it's simple and discourages mixing
haskell98 with more modern modules.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users