Addr# field in ForeignPtr
Simon Marlow
marlowsd at gmail.com
Wed Jun 1 12:07:28 CEST 2011
On 01/06/2011 08:29, Roman Leshchinskiy wrote:
> GHC defines ForeignPtr as:
>
> data ForeignPtr a = ForeignPtr Addr# ForeignPtrContents
> -- we cache the Addr# in the ForeignPtr object, but attach
> -- the finalizer to the IORef (or the MutableByteArray# in
> -- the case of a MallocPtr). The aim of the representation
> -- is to make withForeignPtr efficient; in fact, withForeignPtr
> -- should be just as efficient as unpacking a Ptr, and multiple
> -- withForeignPtrs can share an unpacked ForeignPtr. Note
> -- that touchForeignPtr only has to touch the ForeignPtrContents
> -- object, because that ensures that whatever the finalizer is
> -- attached to is kept alive.
>
> Is it ok to modify the Addr# field? Or do the libraries assume that
> it always points to the start of the block described by
> ForeignPtrContents? Changing the Addr# field would be quite useful
> for pointing to the middle of a memory block. For instance, Storable
> vectors are currently defined as:
It should be fine to use whatever Addr# you like. The only requirement
is that calling touch# on the ForeignPtrContents is enough to keep the
memory alive.
> data Vector a = Vector {-# UNPACK #-} !(Ptr a)
> {-# UNPACK #-} !Int
> {-# UNPACK #-} !(ForeignPtr a)
>
> If I could use the Addr# field of the ForeignPtr, I could get rid of the Ptr.
Good idea!
Cheers,
Simon
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list