backward compatibility

Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks157k at acme.softbase.org
Thu Jan 20 16:26:07 CET 2011

Previous message: backward compatibility
Next message: backward compatibility
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Am Donnerstag, den 20.01.2011, 23:25 +0900 schrieb 山本和彦:
> I'm asking why GHC breaks backward compatibility (e.g.
> FlexibleInstances and BangPatterns) and why maintainers of packages
> should do boring fixes. What are benefits of such overhead?

Hi,

what are the changes in GHC wrt. FlexibleInstances and BangPatterns?

Best wishes,
Wolfgang

Previous message: backward compatibility
Next message: backward compatibility
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list