Unexpected list non-fusion
wren ng thornton
wren at freegeek.org
Mon Dec 19 23:11:07 CET 2011
On 12/17/11 6:42 AM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Dear Wren,
> Am Donnerstag, den 15.12.2011, 17:38 +0000 schrieb Simon Peyton-Jones:
>> | Am Montag, den 12.12.2011, 15:37 -0500 schrieb wren ng thornton:
>> |> I've noticed that take and filter are good producers (and consumers)
>> |> for list fusion, but takeWhile, drop, and dropWhile are not. Is there
>> |> any reason for this discrepancy?
>> |> If not, would I need to go through the libraries@ process for fixing
>> |> it, or should I just submit a patch?
>> Please just submit a patch.
> are you going to tackle this?
I was planning to do it over the next couple weeks. Though it you have
the time or have other implementations already prepared, you're welcome
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users