GHCJS
Simon Peyton-Jones
simonpj at microsoft.com
Thu Aug 4 22:02:42 CEST 2011
| data LiteralDesugaring m =
| LiteralDesugaring
| { desugarInt :: MonadThings m => Integer -> m CoreExpr
| , desugarWord :: MonadThings m => Integer -> m CoreExpr
...
I am not sure why you want to control the desugaring of literals. Why literals? And why is literals enough?
| But I don't still understand what can I do with foreign
| imports/exports. DsForeign module seems to be too complicated. As I
| can see, I shouldn't make whole dsForeigns function replaceable, but I
| can't understand what part of it should be replaceble.
I still think that the stub generation for foreign declarations should be easily separable. The desugarer generates a certainly amount of unwrapping, but you'll want that for JavaScript too. The actual calling convention is embedded inside the Id: see the FCallId constructor of IdDetails in IdInfo.lhs, and the ForeignCall type in ForiegnCall.lhs.
Simon
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list