Broken ghc-7.0.3/vector combination?
Felipe Almeida Lessa
felipe.lessa at gmail.com
Thu Apr 21 13:29:49 CEST 2011
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:08 AM, Simon Marlow <marlowsd at gmail.com> wrote:
> Right, it could be related to this. However this change was made to
> eliminate some causes of NaNs, see:
> So I'm very depressed if it managed to introduce NaNs somehow.
> Could someone make a ticket for this, with the smallest test case found so
> far please?
So in principle the LLVM backend should be fine?
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users