Rebuilding ghc changes interface hashes?

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Freitag, den 08.04.2011, 22:00 +0200 schrieb Matthias Kilian:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 08:44:33PM +0200, Matthias Kilian wrote:
> > I still have to find my noticeses about wether cBooterVersion affects
> > more than only the ghc lib.
> 
> Did a quick test the other day; bootstrapping ghc-7.0.3 from
> ghc-6.12.3 with two different VERSION_DATE files. The only visible
> change was in the ghc library, so this part indeed isn't worth any
> work.

so, in summary, there is no easy and obvious way to avoid the other
interface changes (e.g. in base) that occur when building with 7.0.2
instead of 6.12, and therefore a double-round of uploads of ghc in
Debian cannot be avoided?

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata at debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20110409/0a3ff92c/attachment.pgp>