Set inclusion

Christian Maeder Christian.Maeder at dfki.de
Thu Oct 14 11:36:45 EDT 2010


Am 14.10.2010 17:27, schrieb Christian Maeder:
>> 2. notMember  looks unnecessary, because one can write  
>>    not . Map.member k.
> 
> That's the same for elem and notElem.

One motivation was to ease LaTeX creation by replacing `notElem` with
\notin.

> 
> Cheers Christian
> 
>>
>> Regards,
>> -----------------
>> Serge Mechveliani
>> mechvel at botik.ru


More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list