Question regarding the GHC users manual
twhitehead at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 15:43:42 EST 2010
Hi Max and Niklas,
Thank you both for your answers. I get it now.
I didn't read carefully enough to note that the explicit type on F a b was the
type of F and the type of F (although, in retrospect, this last interpretation
wouldn't have worked as we would have need at least * -> * -> *).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20100125/d11118bc/attachment.bin
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users