daniel.is.fischer at web.de
Wed Feb 17 10:39:07 EST 2010
Am Mittwoch 17 Februar 2010 15:19:33 schrieb Simon Marlow:
> I should point out that for most Haskell programs, the NCG is already as
> fast (in some cases faster) than via C. The benchmarks showing a
> difference are all of the small tight loop kind - which are important to
> some people, I don't dispute that, but I expect that most people
> wouldn't notice the difference.
Probably. And where the tight loop takes a significant amount of the
running time, one can usually write that in C and use the FFI if the NCG
doesn't produce comparable code. Granted, it's not as nice, but removing
the via-C route won't be a show-stopper for those loops either, I think.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users