dons at galois.com
Mon Feb 15 23:56:35 EST 2010
> On 03/02/2010 15:39, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
>> |> Or we could switch to different quotation brackets altogether for
>> |> quasiquotation, the obvious possibility being<|...blah...|>, and
>> |> <pads|...blah...|>. That would not be hard, and would only affect the
>> |> handful of current quasiquote users. But it'd remove "<|" and "|>" as a
>> |> valid operators, at least for quasiquote customers. I don't know how bad
>> |> that would be.
>> | Good brackets are scarce. I'd prefer to stick with one of the many
>> | fine variations on [|...|] currently being discussed.
>> I agree with this. My gut feel is to stick with [| ..|] and variants, and live with the fact that TH and QQ aren't using them in quite the same way.
> Why not provide some nice Unicode version too? ⟦ .. ⟧ ⟪ .. ⟫ ⦃ .. ⦄ etc.
OH! That looks very nice.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users