niklas.broberg at gmail.com
Thu Jul 23 07:36:33 EDT 2009
> Alright, let's set an actual discussion period of 2 weeks for
> ExplicitForall. If there is no opposition by then, we can add
> ExplicitForall to the registered extensions in cabal as a first step.
Slightly more than two weeks later, there has been no voices against
and at least a few in favor.
The attached patch for Cabal adds ExplicitForall to the Extension
datatype, with documentation, and adds it to knownExtensions.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 41637 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/attachments/20090723/9e6fd5ac/ExplicitForall-0001.obj
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users