seg-fault in 6.10.1

Simon Peyton-Jones simonpj at microsoft.com
Fri Jan 23 20:15:40 EST 2009


Yes we are.  If you aren't using the FFI or unsafe things, you should not get a seg fault.  Do help us to reproduce it -- thanks.

Simon

| -----Original Message-----
| From: glasgow-haskell-bugs-bounces at haskell.org [mailto:glasgow-haskell-bugs-
| bounces at haskell.org] On Behalf Of Serge D. Mechveliani
| Sent: 23 January 2009 13:59
| To: glasgow-haskell-bugs at haskell.org
| Cc: glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org
| Subject: seg-fault in 6.10.1
|
| Dear GHC team,
|
| I `make' my (large) project in   ghc-6.10.1, Linux Debian, i386-unknown,
| run the executable, and obtain
|
|   Segmentation fault.
|
| Then, I noted that in a few places the compiler warned about skipping
| some class member implementations in some instances.
| I added these implementations, and now it works correct.
|
| Are you interested in the bug report on the above part of
| Segmentation fault ?
|
| -----------------
| Serge Mechveliani
| mechvel at botik.ru
| _______________________________________________
| Glasgow-haskell-bugs mailing list
| Glasgow-haskell-bugs at haskell.org
| http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-bugs



More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list