parList implementation question
dbueno at gmail.com
Fri Dec 18 19:20:36 EST 2009
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 11:31, Marcus D. Gabriel <marcus at gabriel.name> wrote:
> than parList via parMap. For example, in one experiment, parMap
> with parList run at 0.81 the time of the serial solution whereas
> forceParMap with forceParList run at 0.58 the time of the serial
> solution. This is to say, forceParList completed in 0.72 the
> time of parList. So,
I don't know your application, so it's hard to interpret your numbers.
Are you sure those measurements are statistically significant?
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users