Threads and memory management
j.waldmann
waldmann at imn.htwk-leipzig.de
Sat Apr 25 08:31:08 EDT 2009
Here is some more data. It seems the behaviour depends on 32/64 bit arch?
#######################################################
waldmann at master:~/tmp$ uname -a
Linux master 2.6.18-6-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Dec 12 05:49:32 UTC 2008 x86_64
GNU/Linux
waldmann at master:~/tmp$ time ./Par +RTS -N1
496165411
496165411
real 0m22.580s
user 0m22.541s
sys 0m0.040s
waldmann at master:~/tmp$ time ./Par +RTS -N2
496165411
496165411
real 0m21.259s
user 0m26.678s
sys 0m0.164s
########################################################
waldmann at box:~/tmp> uname -a
Linux box 2.6.27.21-0.1-pae #1 SMP 2009-03-31 14:50:44 +0200 i686 i686 i386
GNU/Linux
waldmann at box:~/tmp> time ./Par +RTS -N1
496165411
496165411
real 0m29.802s
user 0m29.670s
sys 0m0.028s
waldmann at box:~/tmp> time ./Par +RTS -N2
496165411
496165411
real 0m11.219s
user 0m14.917s
sys 0m0.164s
###################################################
I don't understand this. The fun thing is that the first machine is
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5365 @ 3.00GHz
while the second is a much cheaper
model name : Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2050 @ 1.60GHz
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Threads-and-memory-management-tp23221239p23231596.html
Sent from the Haskell - Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list