more libedit.so.0 issues
james.swaine at gmail.com
Fri Nov 14 11:18:50 EST 2008
libedit.so.0 => not found
libncurses.so.5 => /usr/lib64/libncurses.so.5 (0x00000039e2200000)
libutil.so.1 => /lib64/libutil.so.1 (0x00000039dba00000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00000039cfc00000)
libm.so.6 => /lib64/libm.so.6 (0x00000039cf800000)
libgmp.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libgmp.so.3 (0x00000039d5800000)
librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x00000039d3800000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x00000039d0000000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00000039cf400000)
i noticed that my PATH variable doesn't include /usr/local/lib, do you think
this might be the problem?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:00 AM, Don Stewart <dons at galois.com> wrote:
> > We've had unbelievable problems getting past this ridiculous 'unable
> > load object file or shared library libedit.so.0' error when attempting
> > build the 6.10.1 source tree. We initially just built editline in a
> > directory and attempted to manipulate environment variables to help
> > linker (e.g. setting LIBRARY_PATH, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and CPATH) - but
> > did no good.
> > We then just installed the editline package so it's available globally
> > the libraries (specifically libedit.so.0) live in /usr/local/lib, so
> > should be found with no problem. Not so for ghc - same error. We're
> > running this on Red Hat.
> What does ldd say?
> It should say something like this (on Arch Linux):
> $ ldd /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.0/ghc
> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffb09fe000)
> libedit.so.0 => /usr/lib/libedit.so.0 (0x00007f6aa8479000)
> libncursesw.so.5 => /lib/libncursesw.so.5 (0x00007f6aa820f000)
> libutil.so.1 => /lib/libutil.so.1 (0x00007f6aa800c000)
> libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f6aa7e08000)
> libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x00007f6aa7b85000)
> libgmp.so.3 => /usr/lib/libgmp.so.3 (0x00007f6aa7943000)
> librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0x00007f6aa773b000)
> libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x00007f6aa7520000)
> libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x00007f6aa71cc000)
> /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f6aa86a7000)
> For example, let's you know if the system linker can see libedit (and the
> C libraries GHC uses)
> > I'm part of a research group at Northwestern University that is
> > the use of ghc and associated libraries for some upcoming projects.
> > a shame that this is so difficult to even compile/install, and nobody
> > seems to be able to figure out what's wrong.
> Do you have the option of using a distro package? Has GHC 6.10.x been
> packaged for
> your distro yet? Do you have the option of using GHC 6.8.x for now, or is
> there some
> feature in 6.10.x you expect to depend on?
> -- Don
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users