Difference in binaries distribution of ghc 6.8.2
Christian Maeder
Christian.Maeder at dfki.de
Mon Jan 21 04:27:04 EST 2008
Thanks for pointing this out, though I will not do anything about it.
I've used haddock-0.8 to build. (There was maybe a trac entry about
broken haddock links.)
The ghc team used some (odd) 0.8.0.1 haddock version
http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/index.html
I haven't tried using haddock 2.0.0.0, yet.
Somehow the documentation can be obtained separately. (I forgot how.)
Someone else from glasgow-haskell-users at haskell.org could tell you.
HTH Christian
Andrés Sicard-Ramírez wrote:
> Dear Cristian,
>
> Thanks for preparate the binary distribution of ghc 6.8.2 that uses
> libreadline.so.5.
>
> In this binary version, I have a different documentation in
> ../share/doc/ghc than in the binary version using libreadline.so.4. For
> example, I do not have the source links in the libraries documentation.
>
> Are you aware of it? Is it possible to do something to have the source
> links in the documentation?
>
> All the best,
>
> --
> Andrés
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users
mailing list