Version control systems
ganesh.sittampalam at credit-suisse.com
Mon Aug 11 06:38:16 EDT 2008
Thomas Schilling wrote:
> (I am also no longer convinced that Darcs'
> automatic patch dependency calculations are
> actually a good idea. Just because two patches
> don't touch the same files, doesn't mean they
> aren't semantically dependent. Take for
> example "monadification" patches, which are
> typically submitted split up for each file.
> A branch captures those dependencies just fine.)
But the darcs approach to dependency is what underlies cherry-picking,
which many people consider the most worthwhile feature of darcs. In fact
many people would like it to be possible to override even the
dependencies that darcs *does* find to cherry-pick patch A without patch
B that A depends on, at the expense of producing a conflict that then
has to be fixed up by hand.
Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer:
More information about the Glasgow-haskell-users