{-# INLINE me_harder #-}

[Isaac Dupree]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> It's very difficult to get inlining right all the time.  Even for a function marked INLINE, there's really no point in inlining in some contexts. E.g.
>         map f xs
> (don't inline f).

Would it make sense to tentatively inline anyway, and in a later stage,
if that bit of code is still equivalent to a call to f (i.e., no
optimizations have taken advantage of it), replace it with a reference to f?

Isaac
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGRMymHgcxvIWYTTURAijeAJ9xRHqy0PphOP/FdMeuLNfNH50LVACdHd4p
nV5wPk9h7nmOsp30PgCJLiE=
=At6a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----